case law citation us - An Overview
case law citation us - An Overview
Blog Article
Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
During the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court inside the United States. Reduce courts to the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every single state has its personal judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is frequently referred to as the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Even though state courts may additionally generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another more info V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or Female usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they will Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same type of case.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice can be a mandatory need in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.
Performing a case law search might be as easy as coming into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which includes:
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.